The Nuria Method · 01 · X-Ray

Does your AI tell people
it's an AI?

Since 2 August 2026, the EU AI Act's transparency obligations apply to every organisation running AI that interacts with people or generates content — regardless of risk tier. Ten questions. Two minutes. You'll know where you stand — including if the answer is that you're fine. This is stage one of the Nuria Method: measure, act, measure again.

10 questions 2 minutes Free — no account
Question 1 of 10
0%Readiness

What we found

Get the full breakdown

We'll send your detailed results — every gap mapped to the specific Article 50 obligation it relates to, with a practical remediation note for each. No sales sequence, one email.

Your answers are used only to produce your breakdown. Controller: Nuria Labs, Brussels. No third-party sharing, no advertising, and you can ask us to delete the record at any time — privacy notice.

On its way.

Check your inbox shortly. If anything in your results needs a conversation, just reply to that email.

Context

What changed, and what didn't

Most of the noise about the AI Act concerns high-risk systems. Those obligations were pushed back. The transparency duties were not — they are live now, and they apply far more broadly.

2 August 2026
Transparency obligations apply

Disclosure that a user is interacting with AI, machine-readable marking of synthetic content, and deepfake disclosure. Applies regardless of risk tier.

2 December 2027
High-risk obligations

Annex III high-risk requirements were deferred by the Digital Omnibus on AI. Time to prepare — but the transparency duties above did not move with them.

Exposure
Up to €15M or 3% of turnover

Whichever is higher, for breaches of the transparency requirements. The obligation attaches to the organisation, not the vendor who built the chatbot.